Australian healthcare is experiencing a period of significant technological advancement. Digital...
From Note-Taking to Care-Taking: What’s Next for AI Scribes?
AI scribes have quickly become one of healthcare’s most talked-about tools. From solo practices to health systems, ambient voice technologies now promise to reduce documentation time, improve patient focus, and ease burnout. But as nearly every vendor enters the space with a version of “automatic note-taking,” a new question arises: is this the endgame — or just the starting point?
Because if every platform transcribes conversations and drafts notes, where’s the clinical edge?
Ambient Scribing Is Becoming a Baseline
We’re at a saturation point. Globally, over 80 AI scribe products are now on the market (NEJM Catalyst, 2024). In Australia and New Zealand, trials and deployments are underway across general practice and virtual care. While this signals demand, it also means ambient transcription is fast becoming commoditised.
The features sound familiar: record the consult, generate a summary, send to the EMR. For many clinicians, that sounds helpful — until they realise these tools often produce a free-text blob that still needs to be edited, coded, or copied into the care plan.
That’s not workflow relief. It’s just pushing the bottleneck further downstream.
Where the Real Value Lies: Structure with Flexibility
Documentation isn’t just about what’s written — it’s about what can be done with it.
Regulators like the NHS (NHS England, 2025) and Australia’s TGA now differentiate between basic transcription tools and AI that summarises, codes, or suggests clinical actions. Once a tool moves beyond speech-to-text, it enters a realm where structure, auditability, and integration matter.
Structured outputs — such as SOAP notes, mapped diagnoses, or prefilled plan templates — do more than tidy the record. They allow clinicians to complete shared care plans, update chronic disease registers, generate MBS-aligned text, and prepare referrals automatically. It’s not about rigidity. It's about giving the clinician the option to work smarter, not harder.
And crucially, that structure can be surfaced from natural speech without disrupting how doctors talk. The right AI model listens as always, then reconstructs key details intelligently — fields, codes, actions — ready for review and refinement (NHS England, 2025; RACGP, 2024).
What Happens After the Note?
Much of the current AI scribe landscape focuses on the clinician. But patients are the other half of the consult — and too often, they’re left out of the loop.
Patients forget up to 80% of what they’re told in a medical appointment (NZ Health Quality & Safety Commission, 2023). For those with chronic conditions, limited health literacy, or multiple instructions, that gap becomes clinical risk. That’s why the next generation of AI scribes must think beyond notes and into communication.
We’re starting to see early movement here: plain-English summaries, action lists, condition-specific resources, even date-stamped SMS follow-up. When implemented well, these tools don't just help patients remember — they help them act. Whether it’s booking a blood test, starting a new medication, or recognising warning signs, the aim is to turn documentation into a bridge between intention and outcome.
This is the kind of design that prioritises health literacy and shared care — not just note-taking efficiency.
Safety, Compliance, and Trust Still Matter
No matter how seamless the experience, clinical accountability remains. AI scribes must be transparent in how they work, reviewed before notes are finalised, and operate within local regulatory guardrails.
The RACGP (2024) and MDOs like Avant and MDA National have all published guidance warning against over-reliance. Human oversight is essential — as is patient consent, particularly when audio recordings are involved. And from a governance perspective, structured, explainable documentation will always be safer than free-form text or black-box summaries.
In short: AI can support clinicians — but never replace their judgement or responsibility.
Connecting Care: The Next Chapter
The real promise of AI scribes isn’t that they reduce admin. It’s that they can connect care — between the clinician, the EMR, and the patient.
That means:
-
Structured outputs that don’t compromise flexibility
-
Documentation that feeds workflows, not just files
-
Plain-language summaries patients can act on
-
Support for billing, compliance, and follow-up
-
Safety and auditability designed in, not bolted on
The scribe is no longer just a notetaker. Done right, it’s the quiet assistant making sure what gets said becomes what gets done.
References:
-
RACGP (2024). AI Scribes in General Practice – Factsheet. https://www.racgp.org.au
-
NHS England (2025). Guidance on the use of AI-enabled ambient scribing products. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/guidance-on-the-use-of-ai-enabled-ambient-scribing-products/
-
NZ Health Quality & Safety Commission (2023). Patient Engagement and Recall. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz
-
NEJM Catalyst (2024). How Ambient AI Scribes Are Reshaping Documentation. https://catalyst.nejm.org
-
Avant Mutual (2024). Medicolegal Considerations for AI Documentation. https://avant.org.au